<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>CNNMoney.com - Latest Comments in Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://cnnmoney.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://cnnmoney.disqus.com/outlook_gloomy_for_august_jobs_report/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:47:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-665022577</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Correction 53% ought to be 47% I got it mixed up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">economy2012</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:47:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-665020739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What an absolute joke of an article. Its a poor attempt to scrub the job losses that Obama and his democratic controlled congress fostered for the last 4 years. We went from 5.5% average unemployment from 2001-2008 (that includes the jump to 7% at the end of 2008 remember I am talking yearly average). Under Obama we went from 7% to a whopping 10% loss of jobs per  month at one point. Now that its back to 8% democrats are crowing that happy days are here again. Here is the problem. When Obama was elected employers got scared and shed jobs at a 3% rate (it jumped from 7% to 10%). That was BEFORE Obamacare passed. Say Obama is re-elected. That would mean Obamacare has no chance of being struck down. In other words we might see employers shed jobs just so they can hire people back as temps and drop their employee benefits. What kind of loss will that incur? 3% or 5% maybe even 10%??? We could be looking at 21% unemployment by the time Obamacare fully takes effect. Remember there is nothing in the 2000 or so pages of Obamacare that requires employers to provide health insurance to a part-time temp that works for an agency or someone who's job is outsourced to Bangalore, India. Have you noticed Indian looking consultants meeting with your employers? I have just this week. It doesnt bode well. Romney may be our only chance to save our skin or the 53% may turn into the 90% in a matter of a couple of years. To say nothing of the lack of demand for products in general. People with less money to spend (since they are required to buy health insurance now) is an approaching death-knell to U.S. business in a way the world has never imagined. Even a temp or a consultant will be required to carry health insurance now. That means employers will gladly pass the costs on to those agencies or simply offshore our jobs. Their shrinking bottom line and us fighting globally in the global economy for the same nickels of profit demand it. Want to blame something? Blame NAFTA. Blame the World Trade Organization. Just another bad GOP idea like Obamacare that never should have become a law. You see the democrats know all this. Thats why they passed these abysmal laws to control and enslave us all to the government. They breed this chaos as they want to control the purse strings of those dependent on government. When democrats said never let a good crisis go to waste we did not see the evil in their underlying statements and many of us still dont. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">economy2012</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:45:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-643146449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As Richard Dawson used to scream ... "Survey SAYS ! ? ! ? "&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Howdy2yall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:42:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642857729</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Dow is bubbling because of Fed stimulus.  Compare the Dow to the price of gold and it hasn't moved much.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Goodwin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:48:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642828182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reagan's economy added over 1 million jobs in the september before his reelection... will obama ad nearly that much?  No, he's failed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">$26739833</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:24:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642452520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing's changed. Most of the people that brought you those policies are still there. One man, as you all say, did not bring us down. 500 other lawmakers did.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2tor</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:50:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642451106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2tor</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:48:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642450462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a net loss, nothing's been added.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2tor</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:48:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642449946</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really, Slow growth as you call it, is down 400k jobs since Bus left office. Shame you live on emotions, instead of truth.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2tor</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:47:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642448275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hahaha, thanks for the giggles!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2tor</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642119771</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no slow growth. Those were the jobs added. There is no mention of the jobs lost.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TogaShark</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:26:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642029208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With Oblammer, it has been one excuse after another.  Admit it, he is a horrific and costly failure.  He must go and will go back to Chicago in 2013.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terry</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:04:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642009661</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Look at the Frank Dodd bill that destroyed housing and banking.  It was a democratic bill!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DM0009</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:45:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642008959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Daaaaah.  I wonder if it is the mounting deficits and debt?  Or the unfriendly business climate under Obama?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DM0009</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:44:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-642004932</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yea your fellow Americans are just lazy unwilling workers. People who just sit around waiting for a hand out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They have way too much of everything and need to be brought down a peg or two. Everyone knows there are plenty of jobs out there you just have to be a willing worker!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those lazy fat Americans demand to make way to much money and as long as they can make big bucks on unemployment they are not willing to work for the global hourly rate of 40 cents an hour.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yea if we cut them off food stamps and unemployment soon they and their kids will be hungry enough to take the work available at the offered rate of pay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is how you get willing workers out of useless feeders or should I say consumer, starve them expose them to the elements, then they will work for their food at the price offered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NoNameWorker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:40:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-641977061</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can't you make up your own lies instead of borrowing discredited GOP talking points?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hesaidwhat2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:10:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-641972212</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Beats the heck out of the Bush disaster he inherited. I'll take slow growth over runaway collapse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hesaidwhat2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:05:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-641970971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course. The ONLY goal of the GOP since 2008 is to get Obama out, no matter the cost to the country.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hesaidwhat2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:03:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-641966720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not really...the highest that unemployment hit between 2002 and 2004 was 6.3% in June of 2003....2 full points lower than it is today....and by the end of the year (Dec 2003) it was back down to 5.7 %. 2004 saw some extremely low unemployment rates and we ended the year (2004) with an annual unemployment rate of just 5.4%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What else you got???&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeagan1999</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:59:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-641952017</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Just pay no mind to restaurant and shopping mall parking lots the last 4 years."  ?????  Is that suppose to impress the 23 million unemployed ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">willie12345</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:46:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-641942244</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Of course the outlook is gloomy.  The CEOs and board members who own the GOP puppets intentionally want the economy to look bad and are firing thousands of people at a time to achieve that end.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">harrison22</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:36:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-641941924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;are we blaming Bush or Obama. I'm getting confused on who's to blame.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mpcjunkie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-641939913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What policies got us into this mess ask one of the posters? Where have you been all these years? Haven't heard of Iraq, Afghanistan, huge tax cuts? Please, be objective if you want to look smart.&lt;br&gt;The biggest talking point of Republicans is the 16 trillion dollars debt, and they want to make it look like it is Obama's fault. Obama's administration added a lot to the already skyrocketing debt he inherited but if he does not sign the stimulus things would be now much worse that it was in 2008-2009 and republicans would then complaining because he did not sign the stimulus.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Zanabria</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:33:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-641934902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday's CNN Fact Check.  Yes, CNN's Fact Check.  There are fewer people working today than when President Obama took office.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wolfpackbob</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:28:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Outlook gloomy for August jobs report</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/05/news/economy/august-jobs-report-expectation/#comment-641930203</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kiss Medicare good-bye?  Good riddance!  Let's replace it with something that actually stays solvent.  What's Obama doing about the looming bankruptcy of SS and Medicare?  Let me guess, that tax raise on the rich is going to pay for that too?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">InDeepEndnt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:23:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>